But doesn’t it take much greater efforts to cool server rooms with natural refrigerants?
Refrigeration machines running on HFO, ammonia or propane basically share the same machine room equipment. All three refrigerants require high-capacity ventilation, refrigerant detection and a good safety concept. Of course, refrigeration using ammonia requires a little more effort in terms of planning. Due to its toxicity, the dispersion characteristics need to be calculated and the risks assessed to prepare for potential accidents. However, it is often forgotten that ammonia is a proven, reliable and safe refrigerant that has been used in industrial refrigeration systems for more than 100 years.
If you intend to run your refrigerator on explosive propane, we would generally recommend you to install it outdoors. But technology has progressed rapidly, and indoor installation is also quite feasible today. There is no compromise on safety. Having a well-defined explosion proofing document with a risk assessment is a must. And remember to keep the electrical components consistently separate from the refrigeration circuit – either in another room or by enclosing and hermetically sealing the refrigeration circuit.
After praising natural refrigerants to the skies – do you still offer HFO solutions at all?
Of course, we also offer refrigeration machines and heat pumps with the synthetic refrigerant HFO. There are always various factors that need to be considered to find the perfect solution. While HFO is an energy-efficient and economically interesting solution for cooling capacities ranging from 50 kW to around 1 MW, its decomposition products cause the aforementioned pollution. For this reason, we take great care to ensure that as little refrigerant as possible is released into the environment.
Ammonia systems for chilled water applications in data centres are about as efficient as HFO but, for technical reasons, they won’t be economically feasible at cooling capacities of less than 500 kW. In large plants with a capacity of 1 MW or more, ammonia is very interesting in terms of energy performance if combined with using waste heat for generating high temperatures (70 °C or more). At capacities below 500 kW, I think that HFO is best replaced with propane. The catch: Propane is less energy-efficient and therefore somewhat more expensive to operate. Also, propane facilities currently consume a little more capital than HFO plants, whose large-quantity sales benefit from economies of scale.
What do you expect from propane?
If you want to avoid the ecological side effects of HFO in small and medium-sized systems up to 500 kW, there is no alternative to propane. The good news is that in a few years from now, the differences in investment between HFO and propane will disappear.
Combined with the efficient usage of waste heat, deficits in energy performance can be compensated for. But at the end of the day, clients have to ask themselves: What significance has unburdening the environment for them? Are they prepared to pay more for this? And what do the end consumers think – do they want IT to be as ecological as possible or as cheap as possible?